- From: Maciej Stachowiak via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 22:58:28 +0000
- To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/html5/decision-policy In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv32401 Modified Files: decision-policy.html Log Message: There should be a way to disagree without escalating to an ISSUE http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12732 Index: decision-policy.html =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html,v retrieving revision 1.14 retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -d -r1.14 -r1.15 --- decision-policy.html 16 May 2011 09:30:45 -0000 1.14 +++ decision-policy.html 29 May 2011 22:58:25 -0000 1.15 @@ -162,6 +162,12 @@ <p>Note: comments with additional information may still be added to a bugzilla bug after it has been escalated to the tracker.</dd> +<dt>5.e. No, But Willing to Concede: Close Bug and mark Disagree</dt> +<dd>If the commenter is unsatisfied with the editor's response, but +does not wish to pursue the issue further by escalating or reopeneing, +the commenter should indicate that by changing the bug state to +CLOSED and add the Disagree keyword. <b>** This is an endpoint for the process. **</b></dd> + <dt>6. Working Group Decision</dt> <dd>Issues escalated to the tracker will be decided by Working Group Decision. The <a href="#escalation">Escalation Process</a> describes how Working Group decisions are made.</dd>
Received on Sunday, 29 May 2011 22:58:29 UTC