- From: Maciej Stachowiak via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 09:32:44 +0000
- To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/html5/decision-policy In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv25358 Modified Files: decision-policy-v2.html Log Message: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12327 clarify what materials are considered when chairs look at survey results Index: decision-policy-v2.html =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v2.html,v retrieving revision 1.19 retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -d -r1.19 -r1.20 --- decision-policy-v2.html 16 May 2011 09:24:39 -0000 1.19 +++ decision-policy-v2.html 16 May 2011 09:32:42 -0000 1.20 @@ -456,8 +456,13 @@ <dd>If there are no objections, very few (and weak) objections, or objections can be resolved, the chairs declare that the Call for Consensus becomes a resolution. The Working Group affirms or overrules -the editor's decision depending on the outcome. The Basic Process then -proceeds from <a href="#basic-step-7a">step 7a</a> +the editor's decision depending on the outcome. When reviewing the +results of a survey, the Chairs will examine the Change Proposals, the +survey responses themselves, and any material linked from a survey +response. The Chairs do not guarantee that any other material, such as +email to the WG list related to the topic, will be +considered. Filtering such a volume of material is impractical. The +Basic Process then proceeds from <a href="#basic-step-7a">step 7a</a> or <a href="#basic-step-7b">step 7b</a> as appropriate. <b>** This is an endpoint for the escalation process. **</b> </dd>
Received on Monday, 16 May 2011 09:32:46 UTC