- From: Michael Smith via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:46:35 +0000
- To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/html5/spec
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv9094
Modified Files:
semantics.html spec.html
Log Message:
Clarify that sectioning roots also set the context for sectioning content. (whatwg r4847)
[updated by splitter]
Index: semantics.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/spec/semantics.html,v
retrieving revision 1.880
retrieving revision 1.881
diff -u -d -r1.880 -r1.881
--- semantics.html 12 Mar 2010 23:56:31 -0000 1.880
+++ semantics.html 16 Mar 2010 01:46:33 -0000 1.881
@@ -3632,10 +3632,7 @@
<a href="#rank">rank</a> start new (implied) sections, headings of lower
<a href="#rank">rank</a> start implied subsections that are part of the
previous one. In both cases, the element <a href="the-xhtml-syntax.html#represents">represents</a> the
- heading of the implied section.</p><p><a href="dom.html#sectioning-content">Sectioning content</a> elements are always considered
- subsections of their nearest ancestor element of <a href="dom.html#sectioning-content">sectioning
- content</a>, regardless of what implied sections other headings
- may have created.</p><p>Certain elements are said to be <dfn id="sectioning-root" title="sectioning
+ heading of the implied section.</p><p>Certain elements are said to be <dfn id="sectioning-root" title="sectioning
root">sectioning roots</dfn>, including <code><a href="#the-blockquote-element">blockquote</a></code> and
<code><a href="tabular-data.html#the-td-element">td</a></code> elements. These elements can have their own
outlines, but the sections and headings inside these elements do not
@@ -3646,7 +3643,14 @@
<li><code><a href="forms.html#the-fieldset-element">fieldset</a></code></li>
<li><code><a href="#the-figure-element">figure</a></code></li>
<li><code><a href="tabular-data.html#the-td-element">td</a></code></li>
- </ul><div class="example">
+ </ul><!-- a root element isn't a sectioning root. This means, for
+ instance, that you don't get an outline if you just have a random
+ XML file with <html:h1> elements in it. Other vocabs need to define
+ what their sectioning root is. --><p><a href="dom.html#sectioning-content">Sectioning content</a> elements are always considered
+ subsections of their nearest ancestor <a href="#sectioning-root">sectioning root</a>
+ or their nearest ancestor element of <a href="dom.html#sectioning-content">sectioning
+ content</a>, whichever is nearest, regardless of what implied
+ sections other headings may have created.</p><div class="example">
<p>For the following fragment:</p>
<pre><body>
<h1>Foo</h1>
@@ -3668,7 +3672,7 @@
Bar (heading starting implied section, containing a block quote and the "Baz" paragraph)
</li>
<li>
- Quux (heading starting implied section)
+ Quux (heading starting implied section with no content other than the heading itself)
</li>
<li>
Thud (heading of explicit <code><a href="#the-section-element">section</a></code> section)
Index: spec.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/spec/spec.html,v
retrieving revision 1.886
retrieving revision 1.887
diff -u -d -r1.886 -r1.887
--- spec.html 13 Mar 2010 00:46:53 -0000 1.886
+++ spec.html 16 Mar 2010 01:46:33 -0000 1.887
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@
</dl><p>This specification is available in the following formats:
<a href="Overview.html">single page HTML</a>,
<a href="spec.html">multipage HTML</a>.
-This is revision 1.3882.
+This is revision 1.3883.
</p>
<p class="copyright"><a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Copyright">Copyright</a>
© 2010 <a href="http://www.w3.org/"><abbr title="World Wide
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2010 01:46:37 UTC