- From: Maciej Stachowiak via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:23:09 +0000
- To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/html5/decision-policy In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv4540 Modified Files: decision-policy-v2.html Log Message: Address the following issue: "co-chairs should also address objections raised in change proposals" http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9901 Index: decision-policy-v2.html =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v2.html,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -d -r1.10 -r1.11 --- decision-policy-v2.html 28 Jul 2010 01:12:04 -0000 1.10 +++ decision-policy-v2.html 28 Jul 2010 01:23:07 -0000 1.11 @@ -395,7 +395,10 @@ reveal a strongly preferred position; in this case, return to <a href="#escalation-step-3">step 3</a>. Otherwise, the Working Group affirms or overrules the editor's decision depending on the -outcome. The Basic Process then +outcome. In that case, the Chairs will strive to identify the proposal +that draws the weakest objections, taking under consideration +objections raised in the straw poll, reasoning in the Change Proposals +themselves, and other sources of information. The Basic Process then proceeds from <a href="#basic-step-7a">step 7a</a> or <a href="#basic-step-7b">step 7b</a> as appropriate. <b>** This is an endpoint for the escalation process. **</b> </dd>
Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2010 01:23:11 UTC