- From: Manu Sporny via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:40:41 +0000
- To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/html5/rdfa
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv32360
Modified Files:
Overview.html
Log Message:
Integrating changes from Larry Masinter into latest HTML+RDFa WD spec.
Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/rdfa/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -d -r1.15 -r1.16
--- Overview.html 20 Jan 2010 05:10:13 -0000 1.15
+++ Overview.html 24 Jan 2010 16:40:39 -0000 1.16
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@
<h2 class="no-num no-toc" id="a-mechanism-for-embedding-rdf-in-html">A
mechanism for embedding RDF in HTML</h2>
- <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id="editor-s-draft-date-20-January-2010">W3C
+ <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id="editor-s-draft-date-24-January-2010">W3C
Working Draft 15 January 2010</h2><!--:ZZZ-->
<dl>
@@ -321,9 +321,8 @@
<p>Implementors should be aware that this specification is not stable.
<strong>Implementors who are not taking part in the discussions are likely
to find the specification changing out from under them in incompatible
- ways.</strong> Vendors interested in implementing this specification before
- it eventually reaches the Candidate Recommendation stage should join the
- aforementioned mailing lists and take part in the discussions.</p>
+ ways.</strong> Vendors interested in implementing this specification should
+ note the status, and are encouraged to join the RDFa Working Group.</p>
<!-- not everyone agrees with html5 (requested before fpwd) -->
<p>Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C
@@ -332,12 +331,21 @@
document as other than work in progress.</p>
<p>The publication of this document by the W3C as a W3C Working Draft does
- not imply that all of the participants in the W3C HTML working group
- endorse the contents of the specification. Indeed, for any section of the
- specification, one can usually find many members of the working group or of
- the W3C as a whole who object strongly to the current text, the existence
- of the section at all, or the idea that the working group should even spend
- time discussing the concept of that section.</p>
+ not imply endorsement by the majority of members of the W3C HTML working
+ group or the W3C as a whole. In particular,</p>
+
+ <ul>
+ <li>There are one or more alternate methods of adding data without using
+ RDFa, such as [<a href=
+ "http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/microdata.html">microdata</a>].</li>
+
+ <li>There are discussions of alternate extensibility mechanisms, covered
+ in [<a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/41">issue-41</a>],
+ which might allow other ways of integrating RDFa.</li>
+
+ <li>There is concern that continued development of this document belongs
+ in a different working group.</li>
+ </ul>
<!-- UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH TO BE REMOVED OR EDITED WITHOUT TALKING TO IAN FIRST --><!-- version history or list of changes (required) -->
<p>The latest stable version of the editor's draft of this specification is
@@ -348,9 +356,10 @@
prepared) is also available.</p>
<!-- UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS THE PRECEDING LIST TO BE REMOVED OR EDITED WITHOUT TALKING TO IAN FIRST --><!-- status of document, group responsible (required) -->
- <p>The W3C <a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/">HTML Working Group</a> is
- the W3C working group responsible for this specification's progress along
- the W3C Recommendation track.</p>
+ <p>This specification has been developed by the <a href=
+ "http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/">RDFa Task Force</a> and is
+ currently being published by the <a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/">W3C
+ HTML Working Group</a> to further discussions there.</p>
<!-- UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH TO BE REMOVED OR EDITED WITHOUT TALKING TO IAN FIRST --><!-- UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS THE PRECEDING PARAGRAPH TO BE REMOVED OR EDITED WITHOUT TALKING TO IAN FIRST --><!-- context and rationale (required) -->
<p>This specification is an extension to the HTML5 language. All normative
Received on Sunday, 24 January 2010 16:40:42 UTC