- From: Manu Sporny via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:40:41 +0000
- To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/html5/rdfa In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv32360 Modified Files: Overview.html Log Message: Integrating changes from Larry Masinter into latest HTML+RDFa WD spec. Index: Overview.html =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/rdfa/Overview.html,v retrieving revision 1.15 retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -d -r1.15 -r1.16 --- Overview.html 20 Jan 2010 05:10:13 -0000 1.15 +++ Overview.html 24 Jan 2010 16:40:39 -0000 1.16 @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id="a-mechanism-for-embedding-rdf-in-html">A mechanism for embedding RDF in HTML</h2> - <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id="editor-s-draft-date-20-January-2010">W3C + <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id="editor-s-draft-date-24-January-2010">W3C Working Draft 15 January 2010</h2><!--:ZZZ--> <dl> @@ -321,9 +321,8 @@ <p>Implementors should be aware that this specification is not stable. <strong>Implementors who are not taking part in the discussions are likely to find the specification changing out from under them in incompatible - ways.</strong> Vendors interested in implementing this specification before - it eventually reaches the Candidate Recommendation stage should join the - aforementioned mailing lists and take part in the discussions.</p> + ways.</strong> Vendors interested in implementing this specification should + note the status, and are encouraged to join the RDFa Working Group.</p> <!-- not everyone agrees with html5 (requested before fpwd) --> <p>Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C @@ -332,12 +331,21 @@ document as other than work in progress.</p> <p>The publication of this document by the W3C as a W3C Working Draft does - not imply that all of the participants in the W3C HTML working group - endorse the contents of the specification. Indeed, for any section of the - specification, one can usually find many members of the working group or of - the W3C as a whole who object strongly to the current text, the existence - of the section at all, or the idea that the working group should even spend - time discussing the concept of that section.</p> + not imply endorsement by the majority of members of the W3C HTML working + group or the W3C as a whole. In particular,</p> + + <ul> + <li>There are one or more alternate methods of adding data without using + RDFa, such as [<a href= + "http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/microdata.html">microdata</a>].</li> + + <li>There are discussions of alternate extensibility mechanisms, covered + in [<a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/41">issue-41</a>], + which might allow other ways of integrating RDFa.</li> + + <li>There is concern that continued development of this document belongs + in a different working group.</li> + </ul> <!-- UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH TO BE REMOVED OR EDITED WITHOUT TALKING TO IAN FIRST --><!-- version history or list of changes (required) --> <p>The latest stable version of the editor's draft of this specification is @@ -348,9 +356,10 @@ prepared) is also available.</p> <!-- UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS THE PRECEDING LIST TO BE REMOVED OR EDITED WITHOUT TALKING TO IAN FIRST --><!-- status of document, group responsible (required) --> - <p>The W3C <a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/">HTML Working Group</a> is - the W3C working group responsible for this specification's progress along - the W3C Recommendation track.</p> + <p>This specification has been developed by the <a href= + "http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/">RDFa Task Force</a> and is + currently being published by the <a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/">W3C + HTML Working Group</a> to further discussions there.</p> <!-- UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH TO BE REMOVED OR EDITED WITHOUT TALKING TO IAN FIRST --><!-- UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS THE PRECEDING PARAGRAPH TO BE REMOVED OR EDITED WITHOUT TALKING TO IAN FIRST --><!-- context and rationale (required) --> <p>This specification is an extension to the HTML5 language. All normative
Received on Sunday, 24 January 2010 16:40:42 UTC