- From: Maciej Stachowiak via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:54:33 +0000
- To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/html5/status
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv14534
Modified Files:
issue-status.html
Log Message:
Record counter-proposal and call for alternate proposals for ISSUE-4 and ISSUE-84.
Index: issue-status.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/status/issue-status.html,v
retrieving revision 1.80
retrieving revision 1.81
diff -u -d -r1.80 -r1.81
--- issue-status.html 24 Feb 2010 01:23:43 -0000 1.80
+++ issue-status.html 24 Feb 2010 01:54:31 -0000 1.81
@@ -54,12 +54,12 @@
<tr><td id="ISSUE-004"><a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/4">ISSUE-4</a>
html-versioning <a href="#ISSUE-004" title="Link to this entry">#</a></td>
<td>none</td>
- <td><a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/172">ACTION-172: Revise Change Proposal</a></td>
- <td><time datetime="2010-02-18">Feb 18, 2010</time></td>
- <td>Larry Masinter</td>
+ <td>Volunteer to write Alternate/Counter-Proposals</td>
+ <td><time datetime="2010-03-30">Mar 30, 2010</time></td>
+ <td>Working Group</td>
<td><strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/0015.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> Allow much more general DOCTYPE syntax to be conforming, possibly including optional version information.</a></strong><br>
(Same Change Proposal also covers ISSUE-84)<br>
- Comments addressed.
+ <strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0718.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> Do not put a version indicator in the DOCTYPE.<a></strong>
</td>
</tr>
@@ -376,15 +376,16 @@
<tr><td id="ISSUE-084"><a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/84">ISSUE-84</a>
legacy-doctypes <a href="#ISSUE-084" title="Link to this entry">#</a></td>
<td><a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7727">bug 7727</a></td>
- <td><a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/172">ACTION-172: Revise Change Proposal</a></td>
- <td><time datetime="2010-02-18">Feb 18, 2010</time></td>
- <td>Larry Masinter</td>
- <td><strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0000.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> Allow much more general DOCTYPE syntax to be conforming, possibly including optional version information..</a></strong><br>
+ <td>Volunteer to write Alternate/Counter-Proposals</td>
+ <td><time datetime="2010-03-30">Mar 40, 2010</time></td>
+ <td>Working Group</td>
+ <td><strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0000.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> Allow much more general DOCTYPE syntax to be conforming, possibly including optional version information.</a></strong><br>
(Same Change Proposal also covers ISSUE-4)<br>
Request for <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0032.html">revision to satisfy Change Proposal requirements.</a><br>
Further update to <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0054.html">add details</a> and <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0055.html">still more</a>.<br>
Further review comments <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0236.html">here</a><br>
- Comments addressed.
+ Comments addressed.<br>
+ <strong><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0718.html"><em>Change Proposal:</em> Do not put a version indicator in the DOCTYPE.<a></strong>
</td>
</tr>
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 01:54:34 UTC