- From: Manu Sporny via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:27:29 +0000
- To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/html5/rdfa
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv21013
Modified Files:
Overview.html
Log Message:
Updated HTML+RDFa spec to include bug markers for relevant sections.
Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/rdfa/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -d -r1.17 -r1.18
--- Overview.html 31 Jan 2010 05:04:11 -0000 1.17
+++ Overview.html 16 Feb 2010 05:27:27 -0000 1.18
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@
<h2 class="no-num no-toc" id="a-mechanism-for-embedding-rdf-in-html">A
mechanism for embedding RDF in HTML</h2>
- <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id="editor-s-draft-date-30-January-2010">W3C
+ <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id="editor-s-draft-date-16-February-2010">W3C
Working Draft 15 January 2010</h2><!--:ZZZ-->
<dl>
@@ -280,6 +280,12 @@
<h2 class="no-num no-toc" id="status-of-this-document">Status of this
document</h2><!-- intro boilerplate (required) -->
+ <p class="annotation"><b>Status</b>: There are W3C bug tracker items associated with this section.<br/><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9012#c0">9012</a>: There is concern that continued development of HTML+RDFa belongs in a different working group.</span><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9011#c0">9011</a>: There are discussions of alternate extensibility mechanisms, covered in [issue-41], which might allow other ways of integrating RDFa.</span><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9010#c0">9010</a>: There are one or more alternate methods of adding data without using RDFa, such as [microdata].</span><br/>
+ </p>
+
<p><em>This section describes the status of this document at the time of
its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of
current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report
@@ -331,21 +337,12 @@
document as other than work in progress.</p>
<p>The publication of this document by the W3C as a W3C Working Draft does
- not imply endorsement by the W3C HTML Working Group or the W3C as a whole.
- In particular,</p>
-
- <ul>
- <li>There are one or more alternate methods of adding data without using
- RDFa, such as [<a href=
- "http://www.w3.org/TR/microdata/">microdata</a>].</li>
-
- <li>There are discussions of alternate extensibility mechanisms, covered
- in [<a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/41">issue-41</a>],
- which might allow other ways of integrating RDFa.</li>
-
- <li>There is concern that continued development of this document belongs
- in a different working group.</li>
- </ul>
+ not imply that all of the participants in the W3C HTML working group
+ endorse the contents of the specification. Indeed, for any section of the
+ specification, one can usually find many members of the working group or of
+ the W3C as a whole who object strongly to the current text, the existence
+ of the section at all, or the idea that the working group should even spend
+ time discussing the concept of that section.</p>
<!-- UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH TO BE REMOVED OR EDITED WITHOUT TALKING TO IAN FIRST --><!-- version history or list of changes (required) -->
<p>The latest stable version of the editor's draft of this specification is
@@ -553,6 +550,11 @@
<h2 id="parsing-model"><span class="secno">2</span> Parsing Model</h2>
+ <p class="annotation"><b>Status</b>: There are W3C bug tracker items associated with this section.<br/><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8993#c0">8993</a>: Spec says that mapping from DOM to tree-model is not necessary, but later gives such a mapping</span><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8977#c0">8977</a>: Some conformance keywords are used prior to the Conformance Requirements section</span><br/>
+ </p>
+
<p><em>This section is normative.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#sec_5.5.">Section 5.5:
@@ -575,6 +577,11 @@
<h3 id="modifying-the-input-document"><span class="secno">2.1</span>
Modifying the Input Document</h3>
+ <p class="annotation"><b>Status</b>: There are W3C bug tracker items associated with this section.<br/><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8976#c0">8976</a>: Modifying the Input Document section is labeled as informative but include normative requirements</span><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8977#c0">8977</a>: Some conformance keywords are used prior to the Conformance Requirements section</span><br/>
+ </p>
+
<p><em>This section is informative.</em></p>
<p>RDFa's tree-based processing rules, outlined in <a href=
@@ -594,6 +601,10 @@
<h2 id="conformance-requirements"><span class="secno">3</span> Conformance
Requirements</h2>
+ <p class="annotation"><b>Status</b>: There are W3C bug tracker items associated with this section.<br/><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8977#c0">8977</a>: Some conformance keywords are used prior to the Conformance Requirements section</span><br/>
+ </p>
+
<p><em>This section is normative.</em></p>
<p>The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
@@ -604,6 +615,13 @@
<h3 id="document-conformance"><span class="secno">3.1</span> Document
Conformance</h3>
+ <p class="annotation"><b>Status</b>: There are W3C bug tracker items associated with this section.<br/><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8981#c0">8981</a>: Conforming documents are not required to use RDFa constructs in a conforming way</span><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8980#c0">8980</a>: HTML+RDFa has should-/may-level requirements for undefined constructs</span><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8978#c0">8978</a>: Document conformance requirements does not state that extensions to HTML5 syntax are allowed</span><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8979#c0">8979</a>: Please reconsider should-level requirement for version attribute</span><br/>
+ </p>
+
<p>In order for a document to claim that it is a conforming HTML+RDFa
document, it must provide the facilities described as mandatory in this
section. The document conformance criteria are listed below, of which only
@@ -629,6 +647,10 @@
<h3 id="user-agent-conformance"><span class="secno">3.2</span> User Agent
Conformance</h3>
+ <p class="annotation"><b>Status</b>: There are W3C bug tracker items associated with this section.<br/><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8982#c0">8982</a>: Unclear what features are required for user agents</span><br/>
+ </p>
+
<p>A conforming RDFa user agent must:</p>
<ul>
@@ -674,6 +696,10 @@
<h3 id="specifying-the-language-for-a-literal"><span class=
"secno">4.1</span> Specifying the language for a literal</h3>
+ <p class="annotation"><b>Status</b>: There are W3C bug tracker items associated with this section.<br/><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8983#c0">8983</a>: Section 4.1 is unclear about language requirements</span><br/>
+ </p>
+
<p>The <code>lang</code> attribute must be processed in the same manner as
the <code>xml:lang</code> attribute is in the XHTML+RDFa specification,
<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#sec_5.5.">Section 5.5:
@@ -690,6 +716,11 @@
<h3 id="invalid-xmlliteral-values"><span class="secno">4.2</span> Invalid
XMLLiteral values</h3>
+ <p class="annotation"><b>Status</b>: There are W3C bug tracker items associated with this section.<br/><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8985#c0">8985</a>: Inclear if requirement to ensure namespace well-formed fragments is separate from other transformation requirements</span><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8984#c0">8984</a>: Invalid XMLLiteral definition of namesspace-well-formed XML fragments is too weak</span><br/>
+ </p>
+
<p>When generating literals of type XMLLiteral, the processor must ensure
that the output XMLLiteral is a namespace well-formed XML fragment. A
namespace well-formed XML fragment has the following properties:</p>
@@ -765,6 +796,12 @@
<h3 id="xmlns:-prefixed-attributes"><span class="secno">4.3</span>
<code>xmlns:</code>-Prefixed Attributes</h3>
+ <p class="annotation"><b>Status</b>: There are W3C bug tracker items associated with this section.<br/><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8987#c0">8987</a>: Processing requirements for attributes starting with xmlns: are undefined</span><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8986#c0">8986</a>: Link to "Section 5.4, CURIE and URI Processing" points to the wrong place</span><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8998#c0">8998</a>: There is no requirement that the values of attributes starting with xmlns: conform to Namespaces in XML</span><br/>
+ </p>
+
<p class="XXX">While this section outlines xmlns: processing in RDFa, the
support for distributed extensibility in non-XML mode HTML5 (using xmlns
and xmlns:) is still an open issue. This section may be further modified
@@ -789,6 +826,11 @@
<h2 id="extensions-to-the-html5-syntax"><span class="secno">5</span>
Extensions to the HTML5 Syntax</h2>
+ <p class="annotation"><b>Status</b>: There are W3C bug tracker items associated with this section.<br/><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8988#c0">8988</a>: Extensions to HTML5 syntax should be described as extensions, not modifications</span><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8978#c0">8978</a>: Document conformance requirements does not state that extensions to HTML5 syntax are allowed</span><br/>
+ </p>
+
<p><em>This section is normative.</em></p>
<p>There are a few changes that are required to the HTML5 specification in
@@ -807,6 +849,12 @@
"secno">5.2</span> Conformance Criteria for <code>xmlns:</code>-Prefixed
Attributes</h3>
+ <p class="annotation"><b>Status</b>: There are W3C bug tracker items associated with this section.<br/><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8989#c0">8989</a>: Allowance for attributes starting with xmlns: should be stated as a requirement on documents and conformance checkers, not on the HTML5 spec</span><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8990#c0">8990</a>: Attributes starting with xmlns: are conforming even if illegal per Namespaces in XML</span><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8991#c0">8991</a>: Change to "coercion to infoset" rules is underdefined</span><br/>
+ </p>
+
<p class="XXX">While this section outlines xmlns: conformance criteria for
HTML+RDFa, the support for distributed extensibility in non-XML mode HTML5
(using xmlns and xmlns:) is still an open issue. This section may be
@@ -826,6 +874,10 @@
<h3 id="preserving-namespaces-via-coercion-to-infoset"><span class=
"secno">5.3</span> Preserving Namespaces via Coercion to Infoset</h3>
+ <p class="annotation"><b>Status</b>: There are W3C bug tracker items associated with this section.<br/><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8992#c0">8992</a>: Coercion to Infoset extensions mean that HTML document could produce different infosets in an HTML5 UA and an HTML+RDFa UA</span><br/>
+ </p>
+
<p class="XXX">This section needs feedback from the user agent vendors to
ensure that this feature does not conflict with user agent architecture and
has no technical reason that it cannot be implemented.</p>
@@ -860,6 +912,10 @@
<h2 id="infoset-based-processors"><span class="secno">6</span>
Infoset-based Processors</h2>
+ <p class="annotation"><b>Status</b>: There are W3C bug tracker items associated with this section.<br/><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8997#c0">8997</a>: Sections 6 and 7 are informative but appear to give normative requirements</span><br/>
+ </p>
+
<p><em>This section is informative</em></p>
<p>While the intent of the RDFa processing instructions were to provide a
@@ -916,6 +972,10 @@
<h3 id="processing-rdfa-attributes"><span class="secno">6.2</span>
Processing RDFa Attributes</h3>
+ <p class="annotation"><b>Status</b>: There are W3C bug tracker items associated with this section.<br/><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8994#c0">8994</a>: HTML+RDFa will process attributes in the XHML namespace as well as the null namespace; XHTML+RDFa does not</span><br/>
+ </p>
+
<p>There are a number of non-prefixed attributes that are associated with
RDFa Processing in HTML5. If an XML Information Set based RDFa processor is
used to process these attributes, the following algorithm should be used to
@@ -940,6 +1000,11 @@
<h2 id="dom-level-2-based-processors"><span class="secno">7</span> DOM
Level 2-based Processors</h2>
+ <p class="annotation"><b>Status</b>: There are W3C bug tracker items associated with this section.<br/><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8993#c0">8993</a>: Spec says that mapping from DOM to tree-model is not necessary, but later gives such a mapping</span><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8997#c0">8997</a>: Sections 6 and 7 are informative but appear to give normative requirements</span><br/>
+ </p>
+
<p><em>This section is informative</em></p>
<p class="XXX">This mechanism should be double-checked against all of the
@@ -953,6 +1018,11 @@
<h3 id="processing-namespaced-rdfa-attributes-0"><span class=
"secno">7.1</span> Processing Namespaced RDFa Attributes</h3>
+ <p class="annotation"><b>Status</b>: There are W3C bug tracker items associated with this section.<br/><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8996#c0">8996</a>: Typo in DOM processing rules</span><br/>
+ <span class="annotation">BUG #<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8995#c0">8995</a>: DOM processing of xmlns: attributes should look at namespace URI, not namespace prefix</span><br/>
+ </p>
+
<p>Extracting namespaced RDFa attributes while operating from within a DOM
Level 2 based RDFa processor can be achieved using the following
algorithm:</p>
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 05:27:31 UTC