- From: Ian Hickson via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:51:39 +0000
- To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/html5/spec In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv1535 Modified Files: Overview.html Log Message: More editorial tweaks to the updated history section. (whatwg r3900) Index: Overview.html =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/spec/Overview.html,v retrieving revision 1.3061 retrieving revision 1.3062 diff -u -d -r1.3061 -r1.3062 --- Overview.html 18 Sep 2009 08:42:42 -0000 1.3061 +++ Overview.html 18 Sep 2009 08:51:36 -0000 1.3062 @@ -1252,7 +1252,7 @@ 3.2, which was completed in 1997. HTML4 followed, reaching completion in 1998.<p>At this time, the W3C membership decided to stop evolving HTML and instead begin work on an XML-based equivalent, called - XHTML. This effort started with a reforumlation of HTML4 in XML, + XHTML. This effort started with a reformulation of HTML4 in XML, known as XHTML 1.0, which added no new features except the new serialization, and which was completed in 2000. After XHTML 1.0, the W3C's focus turned to making it easier for other working groups to @@ -1260,7 +1260,7 @@ with this, the W3C also worked on a new language that was not compatible with the earlier HTML and XHTML languages, calling it XHTML2.<p>Around the time that HTML's evolution was stopped in 1998, parts - of the API for HTML developed by browsers were specified and + of the API for HTML developed by browser vendors were specified and published under the name DOM Level 1 (in 1998) and DOM Level 2 Core and DOM Level 2 HTML (starting in 2000 and culminating in 2003). These efforts then petered out, with some DOM Level 3 @@ -1287,10 +1287,11 @@ chosen direction for the Web's evolution; the W3C staff and membership voted to continue developing XML-based replacements instead.<p>Shortly thereafter, Apple, Mozilla, and Opera jointly announced - their intent to continue working on the effort. A public mailing - list was created, and the drafts were moved to the WHATWG site. The - copyright was subsequently amended to be jointly owned by all three - vendors, and to allow reuse of the specifications.<p>The WHATWG was based on several core principles, in particular + their intent to continue working on the effort under the umbrella of + a new venue called the WHATWG. A public mailing list was created, + and the draft was moved to the WHATWG site. The copyright was + subsequently amended to be jointly owned by all three vendors, and + to allow reuse of the specification.<p>The WHATWG was based on several core principles, in particular that technologies need to be backwards compatible, that specifications and implementations need to match even if this means changing the specification rather than the implementations, and that @@ -1300,7 +1301,7 @@ the HTML5 specification include what had previously been specified in three separate documents: HTML4, XHTML1, and DOM2 HTML. It also meant including significantly more detail than had previously been - included.<p>In 2006, the W3C indicated an interest to participate in the + considered the norm.<p>In 2006, the W3C indicated an interest to participate in the development of HTML5 after all, and in 2007 formed a working group chartered to work with the WHATWG on the development of the HTML5 specification. Apple, Mozilla, and Opera allowed the W3C to publish
Received on Friday, 18 September 2009 08:51:49 UTC