- From: Michael Smith via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 06:29:15 +0000
- To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/html5/pubnotes
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv15559
Modified Files:
Overview.html Overview.src.html
Log Message:
r1.900: "Mention that for rel=icon UAs should also use type='';
mention what to do when an icon sucks; mention how to handle
missing sizes=''. (whatwg r1713)"
Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/pubnotes/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.219
retrieving revision 1.220
diff -u -d -r1.219 -r1.220
--- Overview.html 29 May 2008 06:14:36 -0000 1.219
+++ Overview.html 29 May 2008 06:29:13 -0000 1.220
@@ -2556,14 +2556,45 @@
<li>The subsection that defined that “contact” link
type was completely removed.</li>
<li>In the subsection that defines the “icon” link
- type, a definition was added for the <code class="htmlattribute">sizes</code> attribute (for
- specifying sizes for icon link types) and its
- conformant values; also, text which had stated that
- “If there are multiple equally appropriate icons, user
- agents must use the first one declared in tree order”
- was revised to read, <q>If there are multiple equally
- appropriate icons, user agents must use the <em class="highlight">last</em> one declared in tree
- order.</q></li>
+ type, the following changes were made:
+ <ul>
+ <li>A definition was added for the <code class="htmlattribute">sizes</code> attribute (for
+ specifying sizes for icon link types) and its
+ conformant values</li>
+ <li>The
+ <code class="htmlattribute">type</code> attribute was
+ added to the set of attributes that user agents must
+ use when to select the most appropriate icon when
+ multiple icons are available.</li>
+ <li>The following statement was added:
+ <blockquote>
+ <p><q>If the user agent tries to use an icon but
+ that icon is determined, upon closer
+ examination, to in fact be inappropriate (e.g.
+ because it uses an unsupported format), then the
+ user agent must try the next-most-appropriate
+ icon as determined by the attributes.</q></p>
+ </blockquote>
+ </li>
+ <li>Text which had stated that “If there are multiple
+ equally appropriate icons, user agents must use the
+ first one declared in tree order” was revised to read,
+ <q>If there are multiple equally appropriate icons,
+ user agents must use the <em class="highlight">last</em> one declared in tree
+ order.</q></li>
+ <li>In reference to the
+ <code class="htmlattribute">sizes</code>
+ attribute, the following statement was added:
+ <blockquote>
+ <p><q>If the attribute is not specified, then
+ the user agent must assume that the given
+ icon is appropriate, but less appropriate
+ than an icon of a known and appropriate
+ size.</q></p>
+ </blockquote>
+ </li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
<li>In the subsection that defines the “nofollow” link
type, a statement was emended to now read (add text
highlighted), <q>The nofollow keyword indicates that
Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/pubnotes/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.213
retrieving revision 1.214
diff -u -d -r1.213 -r1.214
--- Overview.src.html 29 May 2008 06:12:37 -0000 1.213
+++ Overview.src.html 29 May 2008 06:29:13 -0000 1.214
@@ -2583,16 +2583,47 @@
<li>The subsection that defined that “contact” link
type was completely removed.</li>
<li>In the subsection that defines the “icon” link
- type, a definition was added for the <code
- class=htmlattribute>sizes</code> attribute (for
- specifying sizes for icon link types) and its
- conformant values; also, text which had stated that
- “If there are multiple equally appropriate icons, user
- agents must use the first one declared in tree order”
- was revised to read, <q>If there are multiple equally
- appropriate icons, user agents must use the <em
- class=highlight>last</em> one declared in tree
- order.</q></li>
+ type, the following changes were made:
+ <ul>
+ <li>A definition was added for the <code
+ class=htmlattribute>sizes</code> attribute (for
+ specifying sizes for icon link types) and its
+ conformant values</li>
+ <li>The
+ <code class=htmlattribute>type</code> attribute was
+ added to the set of attributes that user agents must
+ use when to select the most appropriate icon when
+ multiple icons are available.</li>
+ <li>The following statement was added:
+ <blockquote>
+ <p><q>If the user agent tries to use an icon but
+ that icon is determined, upon closer
+ examination, to in fact be inappropriate (e.g.
+ because it uses an unsupported format), then the
+ user agent must try the next-most-appropriate
+ icon as determined by the attributes.</q></p>
+ </blockquote>
+ </li>
+ <li>Text which had stated that “If there are multiple
+ equally appropriate icons, user agents must use the
+ first one declared in tree order” was revised to read,
+ <q>If there are multiple equally appropriate icons,
+ user agents must use the <em
+ class=highlight>last</em> one declared in tree
+ order.</q></li>
+ <li>In reference to the
+ <code class=htmlattribute>sizes</code>
+ attribute, the following statement was added:
+ <blockquote>
+ <p><q>If the attribute is not specified, then
+ the user agent must assume that the given
+ icon is appropriate, but less appropriate
+ than an icon of a known and appropriate
+ size.</q></p>
+ </blockquote>
+ </li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
<li>In the subsection that defines the “nofollow” link
type, a statement was emended to now read (add text
highlighted), <q>The nofollow keyword indicates that
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2008 06:29:58 UTC