- From: Andrea Rendine <master.skywalker.88@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:42:23 +0100
- Cc: public-html-comments@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2015 10:42:50 UTC
Hi Aurélien I haven't tested any case yet, but I usually prefer to maintain graphic elements and page content separated in my pages too. Now, it depends on what you mean by "no choice but to use an image instead of ...css". I incorporate graphical elements in form of transparent 1px gif images and use the "real" graphic as a CSS background element. Then I wrap all the content which is to be replaced by the image in an element with display:none, so that only the graphic appears. Would this solution help you? BTW, I don't think that such an attribute could be implemented. As a very basic caveat, consider the malicious use that could be done of such an attribute, hiding potentially illegal content present in the page. Regards, Andrea
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2015 10:42:50 UTC