- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 06:54:06 +0100
- To: Stefan Schumacher <stefan@duckflight.de>
- Cc: public-html-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+Vn_S8hL8wzxvm3ER4MCv-T0X8a=5DBp1qbeEktBs=Cz3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Stefan > I am translating a bit of the CR from 31st of July at the moment, and I > found occurrences of HTML5 and HTML 5. > The title of the spec says HTML5, in chapter 1.6 you say it is known as > "HTML 5". if you want to translate a stable reference I would suggest it be from http://www.w3.org/TR/html/ the use of 'HTML 5' appears to be a bug, the best thing to do is file a bug https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=HTML%20WG&component=HTML5%20spec&priority=P3 If you don't mind, I start bothering you with these small things a bit more > often, since I mostly find small things while translating. you are more than welcome! -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 22 September 2014 05:09, Stefan Schumacher <stefan@duckflight.de> wrote: > Hello HTML WG, > > I am translating a bit of the CR from 31st of July at the moment, and I > found occurrences of HTML5 and HTML 5. > > The title of the spec says HTML5, in chapter 1.6 you say it is known as > "HTML 5". > > I haven't read the whole spec yet, but from my point of view, keeping the > name consistent (at HTML5) would be nice. > > If you don't mind, I start bothering you with these small things a bit > more often, since I mostly find small things while translating. > > Have a good day > Stefan > www.schumacher-netz.de > >
Received on Monday, 22 September 2014 05:55:13 UTC