On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Jens O. Meiert <jens@meiert.com> wrote: > (I can’t tell whether we have a “canonical” DRM in HTML thread—there > are numerous—but one should probably stay open.) > > I like to emphasize that DRM should be regarded as a bigger > socio-political problem around intellectual property, not a technical > issue with HTML and its periphery. I’ve jotted down a few thoughts in > <http://meiert.com/en/blog/20131122/drm-and-html/>. > For the purposes of the two MLs that you have sent this mail to, it is precisely *only* a technical issue with HTML and its periphery, a decision taken by the W3C team and chairs. If you have technical comments about the EME spec, then please post here. However, discussion about the larger socio-political topic of restricted content should occur at [1], which was created for this purpose. [1] http://www.w3.org/community/restrictedmedia/ > > Timing is deliberate as the topic appears too important to just die. > > -- > Jens O. Meiert > http://meiert.com/en/ > > ✍ New book! http://meiert.com/everyday-adventurer > >
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2013 01:31:17 UTC