- From: Ian Yang <ian@invigoreight.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 23:26:03 +0800
- To: public-html-comments@w3.org
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Jukka K. Korpela <jukka.k.korpela@kolumbus.fi> wrote: > (snip) > Hi Jukka, Thank you. Now I have more understandings and less confusions about the element. So, similar to the situation of <article> element, which is not exclusive for literal articles but can be used on any independent content, the <p> is not exclusive for literal sentences and paragraphs but can be used to wrap any text-level content. In this way, <p> seems to be the better choice than <div> to wrap form controls and hyperlinks because <p> is dedicated for text-level content. Yet I still don't understand the suggestion of using <p> as the container of a set of legal-related hyperlinks in footer (Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, Faq, ... etc) when a more appropriate element can be used, such as <ul>. Kind Regards, Ian Yang
Received on Monday, 6 May 2013 15:26:31 UTC