- From: dE . <de.techno@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:45:31 +0530
- To: public-html-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CADofXPAee-RJRoVf9crx=kbTfG07bVTYFW5_U6jWMtd0Dfx-Ag@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: > On 15/04/2013 21:10 , dE . wrote: > >> How about a new tag (or maybe use an existing tag) which specifies the >> nature of the content of the page with aspect of the maturity level? >> > > Are you familiar with PICS? There is some information here: > > http://www.w3.org/PICS/ > > Note that it is rather old, but at some point it did have some momentum (I > don't believe that's the case any more though). > > According to the page PICS has been superseded by POWDER, but I don't get > the impression that the latter has been very successful to date. > > -- > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon > Sorry for the super late response. The reason for their failures should be diagnosed. POWDER is a separate protocol which has to be implemented on web servers, so has all kinds of complications. Then this's not a part of a popular standard. These maybe the reasons why they're not popular, people don't expect much from a separate protocols, but HTML is a BIG thing.
Received on Friday, 19 April 2013 17:15:58 UTC