- From: Scott Ferguson <scott.ferguson.it.consulting@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 22:40:21 +1000
- To: public-html-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 16/04/13 21:59, Betty Shirley wrote: > Two questions: > > 1. Why are HTML Frames deprecated? They:- ;are contrary to the the basic concept of a "Web" composed of individual pages ;are hard to bookmark ;don't render well in all browsers ;break accessibility ;are a pain to maintain ;tend to break navigation ;don't resize nicely http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=34445 There is only one situation where I can justify using them (non-AJAX frames) - and that's only because I've got no other choice (to load content from another site on my site without it being too obvious to visitors it's not my site). > 2. What alternate do you recommend? ;Unique content ;DOM manipulation > > Discussion: I have been building an encyclopedia-style website for > 12 years using frames: http://www.nhmountainhiking.com/ I > recognize some frame-related issues, but believe I have addressed > them. To me, deprecating this useful feature (frames) is like > prohibiting high-performance cars because someone might speed > carelessly. Deprecating != Prohibiting But it is *recommended* that cars designed for high speed racing aren't used on roads where high speed racing is prohibited. If you want to drive around with your race tuned Elf engine in first gear, with plain rubber slicks and your suspension lowered to catch every bump (and bottom out on speed bumps) - as long as the vehicle is street legal, you can. :) > > Recommendation: Please consider re-approving frames in HTML 5, > perhaps including a short paragraph with recommended use. I can think of Google Maps and other similar AJAX frame inserts - not that they don't/can't have issues. I'd be interested in hearing what others have to say. > > Thank you. Fred Shirley -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRbUayAAoJEEdmZP0nNrqlOvQH/31bpKhnwOAnAW3Jx0I9mDpx C10djyrV6wabZkZ5agKdoCIgIIWfj+gxwueMySoL/D7pv0HXt+uOuOn4gXlbqKov BqTlRo8V2D05WJaABUsuNT3IdXsNQgKCSJL6aAefiJX+bE4MRhBYFYCCgJZzaGAJ ssKQ/9yxUrtHs70h72QjZtESFiF0DbZmiR4x8675/6mbRIjWC0hr5xywslhodnPn s4Tnm5dXSfS31kveJ6gtYy5k7M4ohl0KrFznEOiBIgbDtneYjWmg6hej/jrKkCCA og0vfRquOO9Ezjfz5vlLcYvNOQamglAqoXPJH4QUmibVm3e5MkIBxXkAGF7ctiE= =WWtD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2013 13:03:26 UTC