- From: dE . <de.techno@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:40:45 +0530
- To: public-html-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CADofXPAJyaYU36QR3D-ZmpFgbAVATfHG6i5yvEySqpcrEq0zGg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi! Great job with HTML5, good to see you all working hard on the drafts. I not a HTML developer, but this idea just dropped by. How about a new tag (or maybe use an existing tag) which specifies the nature of the content of the page with aspect of the maturity level? For e.g. if the author thinks the page has sexually explicit content, then it'll contain 'sexually explicit', or if it's too violent, it'll be 'violence', or the author may thing the page may disturb the viewer, then it'll have 'warning' etc... etc... etc... The type of content will be pre-defined into the standards. That way the client software can warn or block if the content is not apporpiate for the user; the user may configure the software to state what kind of content is ok for the user, for e.g. 'warning' and 'sexually explicit' may be ok, but not 'violence' then the client software will warn/block if a page with 'violence' tag is encountered. This's supposed to provide outstanding parental control also, and bring an end to propitiatory viruses in a standardized way which do the same kind of stuff in a platform specific way. Of course there're loopholes, like 1) The author may not comply -- However he may be forced to comply by the government where the government wants the end user to just get warned about the content; that way instead of blocking the whole website at ISP level, only this tag change will be made, blocking the page from the wrong audience, making the government and the webmaster happy. Not complying is not an issue, propitiatory browsers often have their own extensions, features and ways. 2) Mechanism may be bypassed -- By viewing the page through a proxy which modifies or strips this tag. This's a concern to parents; but maybe you can overcome this problem by asymmetric encryption <think think think!!!>; however there's no need to do that. If your child is THAT smart, he's smarter to remove any kind of parental protection. But point was to warn to user about the harsh content, and this tag will always do that. Apart from the content type ('sexually explicit', 'violence', 'warning' etc... etc... etc...), there may also be a level (0 to 10) of warning, for e.g. if the page contains a little bit of nudity which may not be family friendly, then it'll be like -- content="sexually explicit";level=0 And porn sites will have level=10 All this will allow warning the user at page level, instead of website level. I suggest this specification must require the client software to warn for some of the content initially, otherwise these tags won't have any effect.
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2013 07:44:04 UTC