- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 04:44:35 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Kevin Sweeney <ksweeney@vimeo.com>
- cc: "public-html-comments@w3.org" <public-html-comments@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 04:45:06 UTC
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Kevin Sweeney wrote: > > The current draft states: > > “Although there is no formal way to indicate the language of computer > code being marked up, authors who wish to mark code > (http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110525/text-level-semantics.html#the-code-element) > elements with the language used, e.g. so that syntax highlighting > scripts can use the right rules, may do so by adding a class prefixed > with "language-" to the element.” > > I was wondering why this is the preferred way over a data attribute such > as "data-langauge"? Is this bug-worthy or is there already a discussion > in the archive that I overlooked? data-language="" would be site-specific. The idea of using language-* is that it can be a convention shared amongst many sites. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 04:45:06 UTC