- From: T.J. Crowder <tj@crowdersoftware.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 10:57:56 +0100
- To: public-html-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <BANLkTimQtQKYkTdvt_JT7yen5zVjAWfwOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Is the current practice is to comment in the mailing list or on the bug report? `b`, `i`, `u`, and `s` (strikethrough) are all currently in the specification[1]. `font` was always broken, IMHO, particularly the `size` feature. I think applying CSS to something semantic wherever possible, and falling back on an introduced span if necessary, is best. `center` *should* have a viable CSS alternative, it's purely presentational. I've heard people saying they still want/need `center` though (here[2], for instance). For just text centering, of course there's `text-align`, and for centering elements there's `margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;` (which results in the element being centered within its parent, subject to some caveats; details[3]). Are there cases where one of those isn't sufficient? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/index.html#elements-1 [2] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11812 [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visudet.html#Computing_widths_and_margins -- T.J. Crowder Independent Software Engineer tj / crowder software / com www / crowder software / com On 28 May 2011 09:42, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote: > In response to the following message: > > > http://www.w3.org/mid/583786989.941443.1306443252301.JavaMail.root@sz0036a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net > > ... the following bug has been raised in the W3C Bugzilla database: > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12803 > > You are encouraged to add yourself to the CC List for the bug -- which > will require that you create a W3C Bugzilla user account (if you don't > have one already): > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/createaccount.cgi > >
Received on Saturday, 28 May 2011 09:58:43 UTC