- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:01:24 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Stefan Weiss <weiss@foo.at>
- cc: public-html-comments@w3.org
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Stefan Weiss wrote: > > I'm trying to find out if the feedback form on the current Editor's > Draft for HTML5 is working correctly. I am not subscribed to any of the > W3C or WHATWG lists (until now, that is), so I followed the suggestion > to leave feedback via the embedded form near the top of > http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html > > The only response I got on my submission was: "xx.xx.xx.xx (my ip > address) was added to the spam filter." > > Is this how the form is supposed to operate? Was my message received or > have I just been blocked as a spammer? In either case, a more verbose > reply would be helpful. I have JS disabled by default, in case that > makes any difference. > > For the record, and to whom the feedback may be of use, I was only > trying to notify the editors of a simple typo. Here's the original > submission (for which I apparently got blocked): The form requires scripting enabled to filter spammers, sorry. I've updated the message to say that rather than mention a spam filter. (The message was a lie, there is no spam filter black-list. I never got around to implementing it.) > Typo, section 2.7.3 (Determining the type of a resource): > | Let position be a pointed into s, initially pointing at ... > was (probably) intended to read > | Let position be a pointer into s, initially pointing at ... > The misspelled word is "pointer". Thanks. Fixed. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 14 February 2011 10:01:52 UTC