- From: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:50:40 -0400
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, public-html@w3.org
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, nathan@webr3.org, public-html-comments@w3.org, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Cross-posting to related groups: I've posted a document[1] that shows one way in which HTML FORMS can support PUT/DELETE w/o the need for plug-ins or scripting. It's a quick draft but I think it covers the basics. If this is not in the desired format let me know. [1] http://amundsen.com/examples/put-delete-forms/ mca http://amundsen.com/blog/ http://twitter.com@mamund http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me #RESTFest 2010 http://rest-fest.googlecode.com On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 16:24, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On 04/01/2011 03:29 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: >> >> On 01.04.2011 21:04, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> >>> On 04/01/2011 02:01 PM, Nathan wrote: >>>> >>>> fwd'ing to some relevant lists - would be very happy to see a proper >>>> response from W3C / HTML WG chairs, particularly the question "And >>>> *where* should this activity happen?" >>> >>> Where is in bug reports: >>> >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html >>> >>> Should you (or anyone) wish to escalate a proposed RESOLUTION by the >>> editor, you will be encouraged to join the working group and participate >>> by creating a proposal and participating in the discussion: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/#join >>> >>>> best, nathan >>> >>> - Sam Ruby >> >> I'm currently interested in a discussion that leads to something that >> *could* be added to the HTML spec, and might lead to clarifications in >> the HTTPbis specs. >> >> I don't think an issue tracker is the right place for that. > > In that case, discussions can happen anywhere; but those that could lead to > changes to the W3C HTML spec should occur on public-html to ensure that all > of the right people see it. > >> Best regards, Julian > > - Sam Ruby > >
Received on Saturday, 2 April 2011 00:51:14 UTC