- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:52:24 -0400
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: public-html-comments@w3.org
On 09/17/2010 04:20 AM, Bijan Parsia wrote: > I'd just like to draw attention to some posts by Shelley providing > support for commenting on the specs: > http://realtech.burningbird.net/reviewcomment-w3c-html5-specification > http://realtech.burningbird.net/how-comment-and-when > http://realtech.burningbird.net/reviewcomment-w3c-html5-specification/html5-document-structure > > I think these are really good and helpful, esp. for people new to the > spec and the W3C. One thing I notice about the HTMLWG's home page: > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/ > is that it's *not* particularly friendly to such an audience (it's a > more typical working WG page; there's not even a list of links to > tutorials, or to these wikipedia pages: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5 > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_layout_engines_(HTML5) > something akin to the latter will be invaluable). > > Given the wide and diverse reviewers expected and desired for last call, > I think it would be very good to have a more friendly entry point. I > know there are other sources of friendliness, so I don't think it > necessarily requires a huge chunk of work on the WG's part. If you have suggestions about the web site, please open a bug on the "HTML WG website" using bugzilla: http://tinyurl.com/2ce2zyd Overall, I would feel more comfortable linking to content such as this if were edited collaboratively, and therefore not weren't written in first person. I would suggest using the W3C Wiki: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ > Cheers, > Bijan. - Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 17 September 2010 11:52:58 UTC