- From: T.J. Crowder <tj@crowdersoftware.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:15:28 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: public-html-comments <public-html-comments@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 29 March 2010 22:16:22 UTC
> > A combination of some design problems and lack of compelling use cases. UAs that don't support or enable JavaScript isn't a compelling use case? This (limiting the size of uploads) comes up again and again in HTML circles. More so than maxlength="". :-) Well, yes. :-) "If you spec it, they will (eventually) come." Corollary: If you *don't* spec it, there's little chance. I'd say the odds of having UAs support a simple maxlength sooner rather than later are a *lot* higher than implementing an entirely new DOM interface. And again, the latter (though very cool!) doesn't address UAs that don't support or enable JavaScript. -- T.J. :-) On 29 March 2010 23:07, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, T.J. Crowder wrote: > > > > I'd be curious what those reasons were. It seems such a simple and > > uncontroversial hint to the UA. > > A combination of some design problems and lack of compelling use cases. > > > > Is the file API at all widely adopted? > > More so than maxlength="". :-) > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' >
Received on Monday, 29 March 2010 22:16:22 UTC