- From: T.J. Crowder <tj@crowdersoftware.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:01:14 +0000
- To: public-html-comments <public-html-comments@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 21 March 2010 10:01:48 UTC
In Section 8.1.1 <http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/syntax.html#the-doctype>., the current published specification says: A DOCTYPE is a mostly useless, but required, header. It then goes on to say: DOCTYPEs are required for legacy reasons. When omitted, browsers tend to use > a different rendering mode that is incompatible with some specifications. So, not useless then, or even mostly useless, as it's required to ensure that the most common UAs in the world (web browsers) behave something close to properly. Perhaps consider dropping the "mostly useless" comment to avoid encouraging skimmers to drop it. Perhaps "A DOCTYPE is a required header that primarily serves a legacy, but significant, purpose." (Separately: It's a header? That seems an odd term for it.) Regards, -- T.J. Crowder tj @ crowdersoftware / com www / crowder software / com
Received on Sunday, 21 March 2010 10:01:48 UTC