- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:49:29 +0100
- To: public-html-comments@w3.org
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Who exactly owns the copyright and under what conditions was it established? The WHATWG spec claims: © Copyright 2004-2010 Apple Computer, Inc., Mozilla Foundation, and Opera Software ASA. You are granted a license to use, reproduce and create derivative works of this document. But that seems false to me. If Ian has a standard contract with Google, then his work related production is work for hire and thus belongs to Google. Alternatively, it could belong to Ian. That seems the clearest. The W3C spec: Copyright © 2010 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark and document use rules apply. The text of this specification is also available in the WHATWG Web Applications 1.0 specification, under a license that permits reuse of the specification text. Which is it? Unless Apple Computer, Inc., Mozilla Foundation, and Opera Software ASA have transferred ownership, they remain the owners (though they grant a liberal license, of course). If there are bits that belong to the W3C, shouldn't *all* the copyright owners be listed? The W3C does not have automatic transfer of copyright: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/IPR-FAQ-20000620.html#holds Who holds the copyright on W3C documents? The original author of the document. Many documents are created by the W3C and W3C consequently holds the copyright. Owners who allow their works to be published on the W3C site retain the copyright, but agree to the W3C license for the redistribution of those materials from our site. "Created by the W3C" has to mean "Created by employee's of the member institutions of the W3C under normal work-for-hire rules." At least, afaict. Thus, either Apple, Mozilla, Opera, and maybe Google own it, or Ian Hickson does. I don't see a likely scenario where the W3C does. I don't think the mere mistaken putting of an erroneous copyright notice constitutes change in ownership. It seems a bit confusing, though. And easily remedied. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 08:49:59 UTC