- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:39:58 -0400
- To: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- CC: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, public-html-comments@w3.org, Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
On 08/25/2010 06:28 PM, Shelley Powers wrote: > I'm volunteering to write a change proposal for Issue 117. In that case, I encourage you to rejoin the working group. > I also want to ask for an update on my other issues: > > The surveys for Issues 96 and 97 ended over three months ago. In fact, > we're heading towards the fourth month. Any idea when a decision on > these will be released? > > The change proposals for issues 89 and 92 were provided several months > ago (March and April). Any idea when these will go to survey? > > Issue 100 did just complete a survey. Any idea when a decision on this > one may be forthcoming? We do not have specific dates assigned to these items just yet. In the specific case of new surveys, I can say that issue-41 is ahead of issues 89 and 92. > I asked to re-open Issue 106[1]. As I stated, I believe that the > longdesc issue--including making obsolete an attribute that was valid in > HTML4, without any intervening period of deprecation--is new > information, as is the new interest in this topic. If you do, I will > also write a change proposal for this item, too. As issue 106 was closed without prejudice, new information is not a requirement. > Thanks for any information you can provide. > > Regards > > Shelley Powers - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 25 August 2010 23:40:18 UTC