- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:50:16 -0500
- To: public-html-comments@w3.org
I'm curious to see how the new Facebook use of RDFa compares to the HTML+RDFa draft http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-rdfa-in-html-20100304/ I think I'm not the only reader who skips past all the blah blah blah text and looks for the first example that I can copy and paste and use. The whole 1.1 History section is just more blah blah to skip over, from that perspective. I strongly suggest moving it to an Acknowledgements section at the end. By way of example, see Acknowledgements and Change History in the GRDDL spec http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/#changes And please add lots of examples, especially a hello-world example in the intro. In fact, I hope that over time, the HTML + RDFa spec becomes less of a diff from [XHTML+RDFa] and more of a self-standing spec. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 13:50:19 UTC