- From: T.J. Crowder <tj@crowdersoftware.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:29:32 +0100
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: public-html-comments <public-html-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <n2rc95470a1004120029v18fe9dfatfe05fbc408e807a0@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, On 12 April 2010 07:57, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > FWIW, HTML4 does not use the NAME token forn name="". > <http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#adef-name-INPUT> > http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#adef-name-INPUT Crikey. Someone once pointed me at this[1] in the context of saying that a form control name in something we were talking about was invalid, and I have been reading right past the word "token" in it ever since, although I do remember wondering why `id` was called out as being "name" when `name` was called out as "cdata". (At least this explains how the PHP crowd have gotten away with square brackets for so long...) Thanks, [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#type-name -- T.J. Crowder Independent Software Consultant tj / crowder software / com www.crowdersoftware.com On 12 April 2010 07:57, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:47:55 +0200, T.J. Crowder <tj@crowdersoftware.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, >> >> Does the HTML5 specification loosen the rules for the valid values in the >> name attribute on form elements? The 4.01 specification said[1]: >> >> ID and NAME tokens must ... >> > > FWIW, HTML4 does not use the NAME token forn name="". > > http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#adef-name-INPUT > > > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/association-of-controls-and-forms.html#attr-fe-name > > AFAICT, HTML4 says anything goes in name="", while HTML5 bans the empty > string, so HTML5 actually makes the rules slightly stricter. > > -- > Simon Pieters > Opera Software >
Received on Monday, 12 April 2010 07:30:27 UTC