- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 11:41:59 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Ric Hardacre <ricster@cyclomedia.co.uk>
- Cc: public-html-comments@w3.org
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ric Hardacre wrote: > > Throughout the spec a phrase similar to the following is used (square > brackets indicate link to simple event definition): > > "[fire a simple event] that bubbles called change at the element," > > > The english is hard to follow and I also suggest that "called" is replaced > with "named" to remove some ambiguity about wether or not it is referring > to "calling" a function: > > "fire a [bubbling simple event] named change at the element," I've changed 'called' to 'named' throughout. > The definition of the simple event would not need changing to accomodate > the above: > > "which does not bubble (unless otherwise stated)" I haven't changed 'fire a simple event' to 'fire a bubbling simple event' because there are so many axes that are affected, e.g. whether the event is cancelable, what it's various attributes should be, etc. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 4 October 2009 11:33:01 UTC