Ian Hickson wrote: > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann wrote: >> Ian Hickson: >>> On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann wrote: >>>> There is no indication, that this might be 'HTML5'. Therefore no >>>> specific rule from the 'HTML5' draft needs to be applied. >>> "text/html" is the indication that the HTML5 spec applies. (Or at least, >>> that will be the case once we update the text/html registration.) >> This would be really a big backwards incompatibility, because >> it is not obvious, what to send for previous HTML versions. > > HTML5 describes how you handle documents intended for previous versions as > well, so that's not an issue. Well, except for the things it doesn't describe anymore. So I agree that the media type registration should remain in a stand-alone document, obsoleting RFC 2854, but keeping most the historic stuff in it. This may require an issue in the Issue tracker. BR, JulianReceived on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 11:08:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:03:57 UTC