public-html-comments@w3.org from May 2008 by thread

Re: [whatwg] HTML 5: Wording of "license" link type is too narrow Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 28 May)

• Re: [whatwg] HTML 5: Wording of "license" link type is too narrow Arne Johannessen (Wednesday, 28 May)
  • RE: [whatwg] HTML 5: Wording of "license" link type is too narrow Kristof Zelechovski (Wednesday, 28 May)
  • Re: [whatwg] HTML 5: Wording of "license" link type is too narrow Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 28 May)
    • Re: [whatwg] HTML 5: Wording of "license" link type is too narrow Arne Johannessen (Wednesday, 28 May)

Allow UL/OL as direct children of UL/OL? Rocky Kahn (Saturday, 24 May)

• Re: Allow UL/OL as direct children of UL/OL? Lachlan Hunt (Sunday, 25 May)

Re: Backwards compatibility and DOCTYPE Ian Hickson (Friday, 23 May)

Re: Don't deprecate tt Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 7 May)

• Re: Don't deprecate tt Frank Ellermann (Thursday, 8 May)

Re: [whatwg] scrollIntoView jarring? Neil Deakin (Wednesday, 30 April)

• Re: [whatwg] scrollIntoView jarring? Richard Schwerdtfeger (Friday, 2 May)
  • activedescendant in viewport (Re: [whatwg] scrollIntoView jarring?) David Bolter (Friday, 2 May)
    • Re: activedescendant in viewport (Re: [whatwg] scrollIntoView jarring?) David Bolter (Friday, 2 May)
      • Re: activedescendant in viewport (Re: [whatwg] scrollIntoView jarring?) Richard Schwerdtfeger (Friday, 2 May)
      • Re: [whatwg] activedescendant in viewport (Re: scrollIntoView jarring?) Aaron Leventhal (Friday, 2 May)

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 May 2008 12:51:08 UTC