- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:13:52 +0900
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "Barclay, Daniel" <daniel@fgm.com>, public-html-comments@w3.org
Le 12 juil. 2008 à 04:26, Ian Hickson a écrit : > On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Barclay, Daniel wrote: >> >> Section 4.12.2.1 says: >> >> It allows the paranoid user to disable the notifications without >> losing the >> underlying link functionality. >> >> Shouldn't "paranoid user" be something like "privacy-conscious user"? > > No, because a privacy-conscious user would realise that this doesn't > actually do much for his privacy. The spec has been written for implementers, not users. So giving a statement about users or recommendations on how users can better protect their privacy is not very useful. Suggestion: It allows the user to disable the notifications without losing the underlying link functionality. Note for implementers: You might notify the users through the UI that this will not protect completely their privacy. -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2008 02:14:37 UTC