- From: <temp17@staldal.nu>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:15:22 +0100
- To: public-html-comments@w3.org
Simon Pieters skrev: >>>>> or just use the HTML-compatible subset of the XML syntax. >>>> >>>> That would work, but why doesn't the HTML5 WD recommend that? >>> Browsers won't parse text/html as XML, so taking the trouble to jump >>> through additional hoops would be a waste of authoring effort. >> >> That would make it possible (in most cases) to serve the same content >> as both text/html and application/xhtml+xml. > > There are benefits and drawbacks with doing this. > > Drawbacks: As far as I can see, these drawbacks only occur if you actually serve the page with an XML media-type (application/xhtml+xml). I can't see any drawbacks with using an XML compatible syntax with the text/html media-type.
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 13:15:42 UTC