- From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:35:43 +0100
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: <public-html-comments@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Due to a lot of people advocating usage of <br/> / <br /> in text/html > content it is more cost-effective to simply allow it -- given that it > works interoperably in "current" browsers -- than to try to change the > mindset of all those authors. Hm, I don't like this design principle, but it certainly is a design principle. Unrelated, the draft still says RFC 3066, you can update it to 4646, I'm confident that this will work. Why do you use MM/dd/yyyy in the LastModified date ? It would be simpler to use one timestamp format everywhere, and allow historic US formats only for compatibility. Frank
Received on Monday, 28 January 2008 14:35:37 UTC