- From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:53:51 +0100
- To: <public-html-comments@w3.org>
Hi, I'm not too happy with the proposed rev="made" solution, old browsers won't know that rel="author" is the same idea. But after all deprecating 'rev' makes sense. I wonder why HTML5 doesn't adopt the (atom) rel="self". IMO rel="self" is very near to rel="bookmark", you could say that the last thing HTML5 needs is a new synonym for this relation. On the other hand I often looked for a way to specify the "canonical" (my POV) URL of a document within the document, hoping that Web crawlers can draw their conclusions when they find other URLs, or even mirrors. I like rel="search", it's good that you don't mention the not yet registered type="application/opensearchdescription+xml". Some obnoxious browsers insist on a "shortcut" relation in addition to "icon", apparently I get away with doing it in one link rel="shortcut icon" type="image/vnd.microsoft.icon". The HTML5 draft doesn't mention this madness, maybe it should. Other relations that *might* be interesting are "schema.DC", "openid.server", and "openid.delegate". Restricting relations to what is listed on a WHATWG WIKI page is IMO a non-starter, even if that page knows "openid", but not "schema.DC". Get a proper IANA registry with expert review, or something in this direction. Frank
Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 12:53:43 UTC