- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:34:30 +0100
- To: "Frank Ellermann" <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>, public-html-comments@w3.org
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:22:52 +0100, Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> wrote: > The draft claiming to be the "5th revision of HTML" introduces > a javascript: "protocol" for URLs, apparently no IRIs in that > case. If "protocol" is a synonym for "unregistered scheme" in > the same vein as "about:", "mocha:", etc. it might be also a > difference from XHTML 1. javascript: is being registered by Björn. I suppose that if the registries actually work in practice (with so many unregistered schemes I'm a bit pessimistic) we should get about: registered as well so HTML 5 can define about:blank. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 15:30:57 UTC