- From: Christopher Reynolds <christopher_reynolds@flightcentre.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:55:54 +1100
- To: <public-html-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3C58A93596842B4FAE36D26B34B18E38068F2BB8@EXCH-CLU01.fcl.internal>
Hi, In reading http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-diff-20080122/#absent-elements (section 3.4 - Absent Elements) I noticed that the strike element "not in HTML 5 because [its] effect is purely presentational and therefore better handled by CSS". I feel that this is not the case in many sites that display prices to customers. Often, when a price is reduced, the old price is displayed using the strike element. In this instance, the strike element is used to denote a piece of data that was once correct, but has since been altered. If the function of the strike element were to be handled by CSS, then there's a risk that the site visitor could be presented with information that is intended to be deprecated but is being presented as current. I feel that the strike element should be listed in section 3.3 (Changed Elements) http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-diff-20080122/#changed-elements alongside b and i due to the way it represents deprecated data. Thanks and regards, Chris Chris J Reynolds Website Production Manager Flight Centre Australia Suite 8, Level 8 316 Adelaide Street Brisbane QLD 4000 T: +61 (0)7 3032 9042 M: +61 (0)412 501 497 E: christopher_reynolds@flightcentre.com.au <mailto:christopher_reynolds@flightcentre.com.au>
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 04:22:20 UTC