- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:18:08 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28379 Bug ID: 28379 Summary: [MSE] should buffering model be an option? Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Media Source Extensions Assignee: adrianba@microsoft.com Reporter: billconan@gmail.com QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-media@w3.org should buffering model be an option? I'm working on a remote desktop application using Media source. What I noticed is that media source is designed only for video streaming use cases where smoothness is more important than latency. However, for the remote desktop use case, low latency is preferred. With the currently implementation in Chrome, little network hiccups will trigger the buffering behavior of mediasource, and user will end up seeing video pauses. why can't the buffering model be an option instead? for example when addSourceBuffer, we could specify "no-delay" to indicate no buffering. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 30 March 2015 20:18:10 UTC