- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 22:37:02 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28170 --- Comment #9 from Andrea Rendine <master.skywalker.88@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Tab Atkins Jr. from comment #8) > in terms of properties that aren't implemented yet Nor present in official specifications, in this case. > sufficiently expensive that browsers won't implement them in the existing terms On <span> elements it is possible to simulate <br> elements. Internet Explorer and Mozilla Firefox also simulate <wbr> the same way. Of course if other browsers implement a UA stylesheet they will also implement this rendering. > That only works for <br> See above. > it's possible today to have a "br::after {...}" rule in your page Chrome, IE (all modern versions), FF and Opera don't allow rendering for br::after{}. Due to the "magic" of the element, probably, it doesn't allow pseudo-elements, so I don't think anybody has used it, as it'd be useless. > the use of 'content'/etc is actually rather slow and unoptimized Is it possible to predict that {display-outside} is implemented more efficiently? Only in that case this assumption is correct. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 9 March 2015 22:37:05 UTC