- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 22:37:02 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28170
--- Comment #9 from Andrea Rendine <master.skywalker.88@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Tab Atkins Jr. from comment #8)
> in terms of properties that aren't implemented yet
Nor present in official specifications, in this case.
> sufficiently expensive that browsers won't implement them in the existing terms
On <span> elements it is possible to simulate <br> elements. Internet Explorer
and Mozilla Firefox also simulate <wbr> the same way. Of course if other
browsers implement a UA stylesheet they will also implement this rendering.
> That only works for <br>
See above.
> it's possible today to have a "br::after {...}" rule in your page
Chrome, IE (all modern versions), FF and Opera don't allow rendering for
br::after{}. Due to the "magic" of the element, probably, it doesn't allow
pseudo-elements, so I don't think anybody has used it, as it'd be useless.
> the use of 'content'/etc is actually rather slow and unoptimized
Is it possible to predict that {display-outside} is implemented more
efficiently? Only in that case this assumption is correct.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 9 March 2015 22:37:05 UTC