- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:20:41 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28863 Stefan Schumacher <stefan@duckflight.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Stefan Schumacher <stefan@duckflight.de> --- Ok, the spec will keep it as a fact, the translation will keep it as a fact, but my comment will state it as a "non fact and whoever is interested should research further". That goes well with Hixies comment: We're not writing a historical treatise here, it's an example. So I clearly say in my comment it is an example while the spec treats it as a fact. I still disagree not to give the slightest hint, that it is maybe not historically proven. But there are more important things to do. (Same Hixie might have thought and was too caught up in more important things in means of the HTML5 spec than bothering about this.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 29 June 2015 15:20:44 UTC