- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 00:35:48 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28832 --- Comment #4 from Nick Levinson <Nick_Levinson@yahoo.com> --- I don't view the world as quite that near to black and white and most even mildly competent geeks don't do something just because SomeBody Big and Massively Important Said So. I don't do any minification now, although I also don't write HTML or CSS with massive amounts of whitespace, either. The reason I don't minify is that I want to upload the comments that I have, but some programmers write comments that they don't need to upload, usually comments explaining things about the programming per se. I think the general practice is that one keeps a set of preminification files that can be uploaded to a website and that's what one would edit for content, style, layout, etc., making copies just for minifying and uploading. Minification is being mentioned in various places lately and I can see why it would be beneficial, especially if a page is large and a user's connection is slow (an example of a big page is <http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/single-page.html>, which takes a while to load even on my WiFi laptop, which I accept since I want a single page for searching and I usually do other things while it loads). Google is not being hypocritical, as far as I know; the source code for their search home (https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl as of a few minutes ago) is minified and has no comments. I don't think Google would object to some comments being kept despite minification, since a second comment format or marker would be explicitly for that purpose (it doesn't matter that the purpose wasn't previously addressed in HTML5 since many things are added because technology and practice evolve) and Google's engineers can surely understand an explanation on that point. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 27 June 2015 00:35:51 UTC