- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 09:39:59 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24752
steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #1 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> ---
<small(In reply to Andrea Rendine from comment #0)
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html51/common-idioms.html#sub-head
> In the examples there's a <h1> with a nested <span> for marking a subhead.
> Could a <small> be used as well? "The small element represents side comments
> such as small print" (spec). It seems suitable and would provide a use case
> for an element which has no strong use cases otherwise.
There has been discussion about use of <small> for subheadings back in 2013
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2013Jun/0005.html It was not
made non conforming, but not encouraged either, in this context, as the
semantics for <small> are fairly explicit, but its use in general does not
reflect this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 09:40:11 UTC