- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:01:23 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27124 --- Comment #19 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi> --- (In reply to David Dorwin from comment #18) > Per bug 27317 and for consistency with the existing members of > MediaKeyMessageType, the name should have dashes. So, > "individualization-request" or "per-origin-individualization-request". > > However, as mentioned in comment 11, the name of a potential new enum is > just a small part of the discussion and open issues, which include > privacy-related text and requirements. Please, let's get "individualization-request" decided as the name that we can put in code to be shipped. Blocking the naming decision on privacy-related text is not cool, when you aren't blocking or imposing uncertainty on implementations that individualize out of band from the POV of EME. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 19 January 2015 11:01:30 UTC