- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:08:02 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27980 Jerry Smith <jdsmith@microsoft.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jdsmith@microsoft.com --- Comment #6 from Jerry Smith <jdsmith@microsoft.com> --- We agree that aborts of remove() and range removal algorithms don't have deterministic outcomes, and further believe that allowing aborts for those operations doesn't seem like a primary use case requirement. We support disallowing abort for these cases. The additional proposal to require remove() to make duration changes that remove buffered data also makes sense. There might be some compat exposure to existing MSE sites, I guess. That's probably manageable. Duration changes that remove buffered data would require both a remove() and an explicit duration setting change. Note this last use case also might not be a primary one. Playlists or ad handling would more commonly remove everything from the buffer and start with new content. I recommend making both changes proposed in this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 24 August 2015 21:08:06 UTC