- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:45:42 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26738 --- Comment #18 from John Luther <jluther@jwplayer.com> --- (In reply to Adrian Bateman [MSFT] from comment #16) > (In reply to John Luther from comment #15) > > If an EME implementation is not *required* to support all formats in the > > registry to be spec compliant, then I suppose not. > > > > I don't believe supporting all formats is required, but can someone verify > > here in writing? > > The whole point of creating the registry was to move these details out of > the normative spec to avoid this problem. Each format is optional to > implement. The registry says "*IF* you support this format then you should > support it in this way". It doesn't say you MUST support a format. OK, thanks, Adrian. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2014 20:45:43 UTC