- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:10:24 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26738 --- Comment #15 from John Luther <jluther@jwplayer.com> --- (In reply to Philippe Le Hegaret from comment #14) > In terms of W3C Patent Policy, the FAQ says the following: > [[ > 32. Can a W3C Recommendation normatively refer to technology developed > outside W3C with licensing terms that differ from those of the W3C Patent > Policy? > > Yes. W3C Recommendations may include normative references to standards or > technologies developed outside of W3C. However, the Working Group should > keep in mind the importance of royalty-free implementations of Web > standards. In the event it becomes clear that the licensing status of those > externally-developed technologies could become a barrier to implementation > of the technology according to the W3C Royalty-Free (RF) Licensing > Requirements, W3C may choose not to publish the document or may launch a PAG. > ]] > http://www.w3.org/2003/12/22-pp-faq#outside-normative-ref > > So, the question is: is it a barrier to EME implementations according to W3C > RF requirements? If an EME implementation is not *required* to support all formats in the registry to be spec compliant, then I suppose not. I don't believe supporting all formats is required, but can someone verify here in writing? > > Philippe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2014 20:10:37 UTC