- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:24:43 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26811 Bug ID: 26811 Summary: Separate definitions of Initialization Data Types from Stream Format parsing Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P4 Component: Encrypted Media Extensions Assignee: adrianba@microsoft.com Reporter: ddorwin@google.com QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-media@w3.org Blocks: 26738 Currently, the Encrypted Media Extensions Stream Format and Initialization Data Format Registry [1] is organized such that each Initialization Data Type has its own page, which covers both the Initialization Data format and - where applicable - how to parse the associated stream (i.e. container). However: * The Initialization Data Type and stream format are used by two different parts of implementations: - The user agent uses the stream format to extract the initialization data, but does not necessarily care about its format. - The CDM only needs to know how to parse the Initialization Data format and does not need to parse the stream/container. - Note: A packager, which is not covered by the spec, needs to know both. * Initialization Data Types do not necessarily have an associated container (e.g. "keyids") * An Initialization Data Type may apply to more than one stream/container format (bug 26738). We should have a table and page for Initialization Data Types and separate pages for stream/container parsing information. Maybe we can use the MIME type as the index for a table pointing to the latter pages. [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/default/encrypted-media/initdata-format-registry.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 15 September 2014 20:24:45 UTC