- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:24:25 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26372 --- Comment #13 from Joe Steele <steele@adobe.com> --- (In reply to David Dorwin from comment #12) > (In reply to Joe Steele from comment #11) > > (In reply to David Dorwin from comment #10) > > Assuming the answer is no, this sounds reasonable to me. I would like to > > include "downscaling" as one of the options (perhaps as a subset of output > > protection). > > That would potentially address bug 25092. > > However, it would imply that downscaling means that a key is "not usable", > which could be confusing since the CDM is actually using it for decryption. I don't think it implies that. I think it is "less usable", but still usable. The ability to include a status with the usableKeys gives us a scale of usability - from completely unfettered, to usable but with restrictions, to completely unusable. This is the only example of "less usable" that I know I would use, but I can imagine others. For example, the CDM could report that output protection is required or that the expiration of the key is immanent. Those could be useful to the application when deciding how to handle errors. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2014 18:24:26 UTC