- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:28:55 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26332 --- Comment #124 from Anne <annevk@annevk.nl> --- So it seems the problem we have is that the majority of implementations are shipping without requiring TLS. We could require TLS in the specification, but if the reality is that implementations do not require TLS, we might lose out on requiring things that make sense in a non-TLS world. Now that we require TLS, how likely is it that existing implementations will change? I doubt new implementations will take the plunge given that EME compatibility is complicated enough. Now that we require TLS, how likely is it that existing implementations will address non-TLS security and privacy concerns? I'm all for requiring TLS, but in what timeframe can we move the implementations there? And how do we protect users meanwhile? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2014 19:28:57 UTC