- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:03:37 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26332 --- Comment #95 from Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> --- (In reply to Mark Watson from comment #94) > There is clearly no consensus to require secure origins. > > The text as now is will certainly cause a Formal Objection, from us at least. > > I appreciate that it's useful for Editor's to have the flexibility to > implement proposals that have not yet gained consensus, for the purpose of > driving towards resolution of uncontroversial issues. > > However, I strongly object to a process in which specification changes are > made on highly contentious issues in the absence of consensus. > > This is a difficult and complex topic and we should approach it > collaboratively. Please revert the change so that we can do that. I concur with Mark. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 24 October 2014 18:03:39 UTC