- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:59:05 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26332 David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|adrianba@microsoft.com |ddorwin@google.com Whiteboard|Security, Privacy |Security, Privacy, TAG --- Comment #92 from David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> --- The current text is insufficient from a security and privacy perspective. Requiring a secure origin addresses many different issues and addresses both the TAG's resolution and spec review feedback. In all the discussion over the last three months, there have been no proposals for concrete alternatives that address as many issues or can definitely be enacted in all implementations. It is also possibly the only mitigation that can be implemented entirely within the user agent. Rather than saying EME shouldn't require a secure origin because it might be possible to implement a CDM that doesn't have these concerns, we should require it unless normative requirements that sufficiently address the concerns are defined and met. I am going to implement the secure origin requirement for now. We can continue discussing potential mitigations for content providers. (I've started a discussion at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2014Oct/0079.html.) If we come up with normative solutions or exceptions, we can consider removing the absolute requirement. If you have specific ideas for addressing the security and/or privacy concerns OR the impact on content providers, please start a thread or file a bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 24 October 2014 16:59:07 UTC